男子借信用卡给情人代买机票 被对方刷卡买车
男子借信用卡给情人代买机票 被对方刷卡买车
小花用情人小建的信用卡刷卡买了一辆轿车，小建不乐意了，向小花索要车款，小花不给。为此，小建将小花告上法庭。1月10日，郑州市金水区人民法院对此案作出一审判决，判决小花归还钱款39525元。
小建与小花均有家室，偶然一次机会，两人通过网络结识，后开始了婚外同居生活，小建也将自己的信用卡交给了小花，让小花代买机票。谁料小花却用他的信用卡刷了辆车，消费了近4万元，这下小建不乐意了，两人因为这辆车闹上法庭。
小建诉称，他因工作需要经常到国外出差，才将自己的信用卡交给小花，让小花代买机票。但是小花却在他不知情的情况下，用他的信用卡刷卡购买了一辆比亚迪，并且办理了交强险，共消费39525元。小建多次与小花协商让其还钱，甚至还报了警，但是小花仍不肯归还。为此，小建将小花告上了法庭，要求她返还侵占的39525元钱。
小花辩称，小建是基于恋爱关系才将信用卡及密码告诉自己的，不光是让自己代买机票，还包括日常消费开支。涉案车辆是小建购买后赠与自己的，所以她不存在侵占。此外，小建承诺与她结婚，但是当小花做好准备打算与小建结婚时，小建却反悔了。小建的这种行为是典型的欺诈，给小花的身心造成极大伤害，且两人交往期间小花也为小建买过衣物，因此，她的损失小建应当赔偿。
法院审理后认为：公民合法的财产受到法律保护。小花在未征得小建同意的情况下，持小建的信用卡刷卡消费，造成了小建的财产损失，应当予以赔偿。小花辩称与小建是同居关系，此车是小建购买后赠与她的，证据不足，不予支持，遂依法作出上述判决。
Man by credit card to the lover on behalf buy air tickets is each other credit card to buy a car
The lover of XiaoJian with a credit card to buy a car, XiaoJian not pleasure, to ask for the models, flowers don't give. Therefore, XiaoJian will flower to court. 1 oct, zhengzhou jinshui district people's court on the case to make verdict and sentence floret return money 39525 yuan.
XiaoJian and floret are families, now and then a chance, two people through the network to meet, then started out of wedlock cohabitation, XiaoJian will own credit card to the floret, let flower on behalf buy air tickets. During floret it with his credit card brush car, spending nearly 40000 yuan, this XiaoJian not pleasure, two people because the car it in court.
XiaoJian v. says, he often work need to travel abroad, to their credit card to the floret, let flower on behalf buy air tickets. But in his small but without the knowledge of the, with his credit card to buy a car byd, and dealt with insurance, total consumption is 39525 yuan. XiaoJian multiple and floret consultation let it return money, and even called the police, but refused to return the. Therefore, XiaoJian will flower to court, ask her to return to occupy 39525 yuan.
Floret argue that XiaoJian is based on love relationship will tell your credit card and password, not just let oneself on behalf buy air tickets, including daily consumer spending. The vehicle is involved XiaoJian buy gift after their own, so she does not exist occupy. In addition, XiaoJian commitment and she married, but when flowers ready going to XiaoJian and when he got married, XiaoJian but go back on our word now. XiaoJian this behavior is typical of fraud, to the physical and mental cause great damage, and two people during the communication for the XiaoJian bought clothes, so, she XiaoJian shall compensate for the loss.
After the court that citizens lawful property protected by law. Flowers in XiaoJian agree without consent, the XiaoJian credit card credit card consumption, caused the XiaoJian property losses, shall make compensation. Flowers and argued that XiaoJian is cohabitation relationship, this car is to buy a gift XiaoJian after her, evidence is insufficient, will not support, then made the decision according to law.
